CDC Symptom Diary Card

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Five-Cent Diabetes Pill From 1958 May Be New Cancer Drug: Health Jason Gale and Andrea Gerlin, ©2012 Bloomberg News Published 7:40 a.m., Wednesday, September 26, 2012


http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Five-Cent-Diabetes-Pill-From-1958-May-Be-New-3895614.php


Five-Cent Diabetes Pill From 1958 May Be New Cancer Drug: Health

Published 7:40 a.m., Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Sept. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The next new treatment for breast, colon and prostate cancers, among others, may be a diabetes drug first approved in 1958.
Metformin, the most commonly used medicine to lower blood- sugar, is the subject of about 50 cancer studies globally, according to U.S. government clinical trial information compiled by Bloomberg. The research began after scientists found metformin prevented tumors in mice and that diabetics were less likely to develop a malignancy if they were taking the 5 cents- a-day pill than other diabetes medications.
The medicine is dispensed about 120 million times annually, according to a 2010 report in the journal Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. If the latest trials on breast and other tumors are successful, the drug could become a cheap weapon in the fight against a myriad of diseases including pancreatic and ovarian cancers. All told, cancer kills one in eight people and is the second-leading cause of death in most developed countries.
“The hope is that if it does show safety and efficacy, it would be available in a cost-effective way,” said Chandini Portteus, vice president of research, evaluation and scientific programs at Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a Dallas-based breast cancer advocacy group. “It would be wonderful for patients if we had something that we knew worked and was safe and low- cost.”
The organization has spent about $10 million investigating metformin for breast cancer, Portteus said. “We have to turn over every single rock to determine what the options are for patients who need them.”

Millions of Deaths

Global cancer deaths will climb to 13.1 million by 2030 from 7.6 million in 2008, the Geneva-based World Health Organization said in February. Cancer costs totaled $124.6 billion in the U.S. alone in 2010, according to the National Cancer Institute. Newer, more targeted drug therapies, such as Dendreon Corp.’s $93,000-a-year Provenge for prostate cancer, may add only a few months of life.
Metformin was the seventh most-dispensed medicine in the U.S. in 2011, according to a list published by IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics in April that ranked a group of painkillers that includes Vicodin as the most-prescribed. A pack of 84 500-milligram tablets of the diabetes pill, taken twice daily, costs the U.K.’s National Health Service 1.37 pounds, or the equivalent of about 3 pence (5 U.S. cents) a day.
The MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston is studying metformin in at least eight trials, according to a National Institutes of Health online database.

‘Safe and Cheap’

“It is safe and it is cheap,” said Donghui Li, an epidemiologist and professor of medicine at the center. “It reduces the risk and has better survival” in studies she’s done in pancreatic cancer patients.
Patients who had taken metformin had a 60 percent lower risk of developing pancreatic cancer, according to a case- control study Li published in 2009 in which she compared cancer patients taking metformin against people not on metformin.
Metformin didn’t benefit patients whose pancreatic cancer had already spread to other tissues, Li reported this year in the journal Clinical Cancer Research. Those patients whose malignancies were confined to the pancreas survived longer if they were on metformin -- an average of 15 months, or four months more than patients not taking the drug, she found.
More research is needed to confirm those benefits in patients as their disease is developing, Li said.
“I got a lot of calls from patients and other clinicians, but I told them I cannot give them a recommendation,” she said.

Lack of Funding

Further studies have been hampered by a lack of funding, Li said. Large-scale trials can cost tens of millions of dollars. Metformin, which Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. sold in the U.S. as Glucophage, lost patent protection years ago, meaning that manufacturers no longer reap significant profits from its sale.
Pamela Goodwin, an oncologist at Toronto’s Mount Sinai Hospital, is leading a trial in 3,582 breast-cancer patients at 300 locations. Data analysis from the five-year study may start in 2016 or 2017, according to Goodwin, who said she was ready to start on the research a decade ago, but lacked financial support from companies, including one that still had a patented version. She declined to identify the company.
“When they realized the results wouldn’t be available until they lost their patent, they pulled out,” said Goodwin, whose $25 million study is supported by the Canadian and U.S. governments as well as not-for-profit groups including the Canadian Cancer Society, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Cancer Research UK. Apotex Inc., a Toronto-based maker of generic medicines, is supplying metformin and a placebo used in the trial.

French Lilac

“All of the evidence has just become stronger while we waited,” said Goodwin, who is also a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto.
Metformin is a synthetic form of a compound found in French lilac, used as an herbal remedy for frequent urination in the Middle Ages. Inside cells, it acts like a weak poison. Mitochondria, the power source in cells, are tricked into thinking the body is exercising and needs to draw more nutrients and energy from the blood, according to Dario Alessi, a biochemist at the University of Dundee who studies how messages are transmitted within cells.
Registering low energy levels, cells turn off the inappropriate division that is a hallmark of cancer, he said. By lowering blood-glucose levels and sensitizing cells to the effects of insulin, metformin may help control levels of the hormone, which is implicated in cell division and cancer.

‘Very Open-Minded’

Alessi and colleagues suspected that if cancer cells were treated with metformin, they would be tricked into thinking they don’t have enough energy to divide and grow. He petitioned diabetes epidemiologist Andrew Morris to search a database of users of metformin and other diabetes drugs for their cancer incidence to test the theory.
“Me, being very open-minded, said, ‘but we’ve been using it for diabetes for 50 years and that’s all it does,” said Morris, now the University of Dundee’s dean of medicine and Scotland’s chief scientist. He and colleagues conducted two epidemiological studies based on observational data.
“We showed that those who hadn’t developed cancer had a greater tendency to have been prescribed metformin,” Morris said in an interview.
The results showed 20 percent fewer cases of cancer among diabetics taking metformin, Alessi said. “The nice thing is that this has been replicated by at least 10 other studies now with larger patient numbers in other parts of the world.”
Researchers are pooling the data to discern the cancer types metformin may be most protective against, Morris said.
When Alessi and colleagues gave metformin to tumor-prone mice, they found the drug delayed the emergence of growths by 30 percent to 40 percent, he said. In that way, metformin could be used to stop cancer cells before they develop into tumors.


--Editors: Kristen Hallam, Rick Schine

To contact the reporters on this story: Jason Gale in Melbourne at j.gale@bloomberg.net; Andrea Gerlin in London at agerlin@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jason Gale at j.gale@bloomberg.net; Phil Serafino at pserafino@bloomberg.net


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Five-Cent-Diabetes-Pill-From-1958-May-Be-New-3895614.php#ixzz27d3aMncr
 




Monday, September 24, 2012

In loving memory of Heidi, from their blog





When You Both Have Cancer: I Will Always Love You Heidi - Farewell: Heidi Hendricks Heidi departed for Heaven this morning.   I will always love her.   Thank you for the prayers and positive tho...

My deepest sympathies to Joe and their families.  Heidi is loved by many, including me.  Rest in Peace sweet Heidi.

Positive Results Blog: National HBOC Week

Positive Results Blog: National HBOC Week: National HBOC week starts today.  As I mentioned in my Ms. Magazine blog post about HBOC week,  most people don't yet know about Here...

Friday, September 21, 2012

New Approach to Optimal Debulking



Ovarian Cancer is a cancer that attacks the entire abdominal cavity, when advanced.  This video exemplifies the need for primary care doctors and gynecologists, as well as other specialists, to better work together when it comes to caring for their patients.

Here he speaks about how they consult with and utilize the surgeons who specialize in areas of the upper abdomen to improve chances of progression free survival.  Very interesting to hear.

I find it fascinating that our medical system is compartmentalized in such a way that an individual can have 5 or 6 specialists looking at the exact same region in the body.  Especially when it comes to the pelvic and abdominal area of our bodies.

The PCPs are more crucial than ever before because they are the ones who need to assimilate this information and see the bigger picture.

My word of advice today is make sure you have a really good PCP.  If nothing else, find one who is older and interested in research, not settled.

If my PCP had put the little pieces of my puzzle together, maybe my outcome would have been better.


Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Chants for the Curious and "Strong Like You", a song for the Brave

Here is your chant for today!

"Outsmart Ovarian Cancer Together" 
by Denise Archuleta, September 17, 2012

Know your bodies
Know your bodies

You are a woman

Hear the whispers
Hear the whispers

Your gems, your ovaries

Your gems cry out loud

The cancer is the cloud

Hidden within you
Hidden within you

They cry and scream softly

So quiet
So quiet

Hear the whispers
Hear the whispers

You know somethings wrong
You know somethings wrong

Never ignore it
Never ignore it

Your gems cry out loud

The cancer is the cloud

You feel it, You know it
You feel it, You know it

Feel the whispers
Feel the whispers

Don't linger, don't wait
Don't linger, don't wait

It hides while it bleeds you
It hides while it steals you

Be Brave, Be strong

Ask your questions now

Don't wait too long

We are survivors
Your teachers, Your mentors

Your gems cry out loud

The cancer is the cloud

Outsmart       Ovarian        Cancer      Together!

Here is your song for today!  "Strong Like You"
"Strong Like You"http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/47372225#47372225 


I am sharing this moment with you again, because the song written for my mom, by Kathie Lee Gifford and David Friedman. It speaks for all of us who need strength.  It is precious.  I love you mom.

We were on the KLGandHoda 4th Hour of Today in May of 2012.  My mom was honored!

I am so grateful for this and we will never forget.  Thank you Kathie Lee and Hoda, and David, Chandra and Davy!

I just wanted to play this again because it makes people smile.

Love,
Denise



http://www.causes.com/causes/651059-teal-to-heal-turn-facebook-teal-in-september/actions/1678558

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Yes on TEST Act (H.R. 6272) Clinical Trial Reform

 Please support H.R. 6272

By Roxanne Cousins
http://cancerfocus.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3759

September is National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month!!! This is a month dedicated to raising awareness, money, hope, and telling the cold hard truth about what we who are fighting this disease are up against. I am an ovarian cancer survivor who was diagnosed Stage IIIC in May 2010. I was just shy of 38 at diagnosis, married to a wonderful husband with whom I had a 10 year old son and not in the least bit prepared for a cancer diagnosis! After about 7 months of a remission, I had a recurrence and recently finished treatment but am probably looking at a long line of continued chemotherapy ahead of me, if I'm lucky. Since it is widely stated, even among some oncologists, that there has been no change in the death rate with regard to ovarian cancer in over 30 years, I am looking at a fairly uncertain future even though I am only 40 years old. Despite all this, I do feel that I have a positive attitude. I believe that there is a cure and that it will be found but I also feel that the current system is going to make that pretty difficult business. 

Like many cancer patients, researching the latest clinical trials and possible treatment options is something I do every day. What I have suspected and what I am beginning to understand to be a certainty now is that there are drugs out there that have been proven to help cancer survivors yet are not getting FDA approval and, despite positive results in clinical trials, the drugs become unavailable. Let me repeat: Good drugs that have been shown to be effective in fighting ovarian cancer are purposely made unavailable. 

Recently, I was in the running for a vaccine trial (KLH + OPT-821) in Oklahoma City and met a wonderful gyn/onc there. She was mentioning to me how I may, at some point, want to look into a PARP trial (a class of drugs that has gotten a lot of positive reviews within gynecological oncology. She went on to say that she felt Olaparib (one specific PARP) was a very good drug, probably better than Veliparib (a newer one that has come out and is in trials), and that some people had great responses etc. but that it did not get FDA approval and now is going to be very difficult to get. She said it would likely start showing up in Europe in trials there and then maybe someday they'd bring it back over here. 

I did go ahead and ask my local oncologist if he could get it off label and it was confirmed that no, since it is not FDA approved, they can't get it for me and while there are a few trials still out there on it I guess after they're closed, that will be it. 

A fellow survivor I am in touch with recently told me that she was able to get the PARP drug Olaparib through a clinical trial some time ago. She said that the oncologist at this site, who is heavily involved in clinical trials, told her that the problem was with "drug company economics" and, while the drug worked well for ovarian cancer patients and in a number of breast cancer patients with a particular type of mutation, further trials by the pharmaceutical companies to see if it would work with a larger group of breast cancer patients didn't go as well. According to this oncologist, the "universe" of those patients who could benefit wasn't as large as they would have liked, and therefore not worth their time so it was essentially dropped. There is another drug called Farletuzumab that worked very well for some ovarian cancer survivors - I believe it has met with the same fate. Successful in trials, yet unavailable. There are other I can only wonder about.

One major problem that is glaringly obvious in its need to be fixed is the opaque nature of the clinical trial system. This broken system ensures that information needed by the public as well as researchers and others who are looking for a cure is not open for sharing, nor is it added to the general base of existing knowledge for a particular disease. This is the opposite of what should be happening and what most people think is happening with information gleaned from clinical trials. In trials that have already been completed on the government website Clinicaltrials.gov where trials are registered, the "Results" tab is almost always blank, and one has to ask around, talk to people in the know, and put things together. The Transparency for Clinical Trials Act (or the TEST Act, H.R. 6272), was recently introduced in Congress by Rep Ed Markey (D-MA) and addresses this issue of purposely-withheld information by drug companies but, sadly, is projected to have only a 3% chance of passing. This will not solve everything, but it’ll be a heck of a lot harder for drug companies to deny patients of drugs that are showing positive results, in black and white for all the world to see. 
Additionally, Donald Light and Joel Lexchin point out that:

"Taxpayers pay for most research costs, and many clinical trials as well. In 2000, for example, industry spent 18% of its $13 billion for R&D on basic research, or $2.3 billion in gross costs (National Science Foundation 2003). All of that money was subsidized by taxpayers through deductions and tax credits. Taxpayers also paid for all $18 billion in NIH funds, as well as for R&D funds in the Department of Defense and other public budgets. Most of that money went for basic research to discover breakthrough drugs, and public money also supports more than 5000 clinical trials (Bassand, Martin, Ryden et al. 2002). Taxpayer contributions are similar in more recent years, only larger."

So the public subsidizes these trials, but it is with the implicit understanding that the pharmaceutical industry is diligently working toward a cure, learning new information through research, and adding that new information to the existing body of knowledge, NOT hoarding information and choosing what to do with the data based on monetary factors alone. So, after all the time and expense involved in these clinical trials, a drug that was extremely promising and had many successes with ovarian cancer as well as some breast cancer patients is now essentially unavailable. I do not feel I am hyperbolizing when I say this is outrageous, on many levels. The women who have participated in these trials (unless it is through the NIH) get to and from the trial site on their own dime and it is often very expensive; even the cost of transportation for these valuable trial subjects is not absorbed by the pharmaceutical companies. The tacit understanding of these women (many of them desperate and in end stages) is that even if the trial will not help them, they are giving of themselves to help advance the body of knowledge that exists and hopefully what is learned will lead to a cure for their fellow survivors. The current way of doing business is a slap in the face to these women, and a breach (I feel sure) of their understanding of what might be done with the information gathered, which is to use it only in a way that benefits the company.

Why in the world is a drug that has been effective for so many go through trials and then end up becoming not available? I feel quite sure that the story of Olaparib is not unusual, as it seems that this is the way the business model is set up. Drug companies' use of countless human guinea pigs and taxpayer dollars to find successful treatments for cancer or other diseases should not be allowed to make these drugs unavailable; this is patently unethical. 

With 1 out of 3 women and 1 out of 2 men facing a diagnosis of cancer at some time in their lives, these are issues we should all be aware of. We owe it to ourselves and those we love to get involved and spread the word about what is going on. The issues laid out here do not apply to only women with ovarian cancer, but to anyone who is affected by cancer or who simply cares about the cause. Now is the time to pledge to break down barriers - and I’m talking about ANYTHING that gets in the way – to The Cure! We cannot allow ourselves to sit back comfortably as women continue to die while treatments are being withheld and pharmaceutical companies continue with business as usual. A survivor friend did some research on the history of the FDA and found that the biggest changes occurred when there was public outcry, so if that’s what it takes…

This September, let’s do more than wear our Teal t-shirts and ribbons. Let’s demand more than what we are currently given, and let’s channel the loving and generous sentiment that characterize the people of this nation, and encourage them to support us where it really matters and demand change. Let’s no longer allow the false narrative that pharmaceutical companies are doing all they can and as fast at they can to find cures as that is precisely what is perpetuating the system. 

Write your Congressmen and women and simply demand that they support cancer patients by voting for the TEST Act (H.R. 6272) to reform the clinical trial system, and to use their legislative power to push for more information sharing, more innovative research, and more access to potentially helpful drugs that have already been identified. You can find your representative using the following link: 

http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/

Also, please call or write OCNA at

ocna@ovariancancer.org 

and ask them to not only support the TEST Act, but to make us aware of these types of issues in the future and work toward breaking any and all barriers that prevent us from access to treatments that we desperately need! 

Here’s to progress and to people power!!


References

Light, D., J. Lexchin. 2004. Will Lower Drug Prices Jeopardize Drug Research? A Policy Fact Sheet. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(1):W1-W4.

http://www.govtrack.us/

Friday, September 14, 2012

Open Letter to Facebook

After you read the letter, please see the notes
 from my conversation with the sales department
 at Facebook.  

She was so nice.  I really appreciated her time.  

I don't have $50K.

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

Here at "Turn Facebook Teal to Heal" have almost doubled our goal!  Men and women around the world are asking for Teal Facebook Pages in September in honor of Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month.

Below is a PSA from Joe Girardi of the Yankees, because his mom died of ovarian cancer.  
I have been researching the FB platform even more and find that the only place for a PSA is the sign in page.  Will you please consider linking this PSA to your sign in page and changing it's color to Teal?   

http://www.causes.com/causes/651059-teal-to-heal-turn-facebook-teal-in-september/actions/1678558


New York Yankees' Manager Joe Girardi speaks about losing his mother to Ovarian Cancer. He discusses the signs and symptoms of ovarian cancer. Together we can break the silence on ovarian cancer! Public Service Announcement by the National Ovarian Cancer Coalition - www.OVARIAN.org .  Published on Apr 5, 2012 by NOCCNational



On my blog you will also see a badge that links followers to the CDC, so that anyone can get materials about this deadly disease.  It kills 4 out of 5 women.  


I saw that Facebook is stories now, as part of it's platform.  I am so pleased to see that.  But those stories are not seen before someone signs in.

Please take this unique opportunity to demonstrate the goodwill efforts of Facebook to all individuals, both members and non-members, by linking this PSA to your sign in page and changing the color to Teal in September of 2012.

(This was emailed to Facebook sales and marketing departments on 09-13-12, one of many so far)
.......................................................................................................................................................
09-14-12

I just contacted the sales department by phone  800-608-1600 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting to ask if they are willing to post a PSA on their sign in page about ovarian cancer.  The representative was overly polite given she could not help me. 

I was told to create a FAN page and use my FAN page to raise awareness.  

I don't agree with that but I will work on one so that the same people who are my friends and petitioners and members of my cause page can "like" me and eventually spread the word.  They already know about ovarian cancer and want you to help us raise awareness.

My goal is to get the message out to people who have never heard of ovarian cancer.  There is no screening test.

  The best chance we have at a long survival is to detect it early.  It's a time bomb ticking away in our bodies and most doctors and gynecologists misdiagnose it.  Literally it's a sneaky bastard, a killer.

So I asked about advertising.  She said that if I could raise 50K dollars we could begin a conversation to do the following:

Turn Facebook's sign in page "TEAL"
Place a badge to the CDC  or PSA link for a Video
And state that this is ovarian cancer awareness month

So much money has already been spent on producing PSAs that are already available to be used.  It would cost Facebook next to nothing to change the color of one page to Teal and add the badge and blurb about ovarian cancer.  

Facebook has only recently started using their sign in page's premium real estate for advertising.  

I don't want to preach to the choir any more.  My friends already know about ovarian cancer.  

We are not a sea of teal yet.  We are a small but feisty group that suffers terribly the side effects of major abdominal surgeries to remove everything but the kitchen sink. Our voices are strong, but spread all over the world.  We are not concentrated in dense populations so we are hard to see.

Our grassroots efforts are making a huge difference, but we don't have time to wait for this message to grow in small stages.  We don't have a screening tool!   

I am asking Facebook to make an exception to the advertising policy and give back to the community that loves them by offering PSA's on their sign in page.  Do something good for the community and begin with our cause.

You will save many lives!

Thank you,
Denise Archuleta


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

People Magazine reports Kathy Bates has breast cancer

I am shocked.  A friend of mine (thank you Regina) sent me a note today that Kathy Bates has breast cancer.  People Magazine reported this today online.....

Here is the link to their article on our lovely and endearing Kathy Bates:

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20628972,00.html#disqus_thread

Dear Kathy Bates, I think you are so gracious and endearing, beautiful and talented.  Thank you for sharing your story with all of us.  May you heal in peace, fully and without suffering.

Peace and Blessings to you,

Denise


Sunday, September 09, 2012

Tastes Like Heaven

Sunday is a day of rest for most, at least I hope.  I hope you know that I have been working very hard over the past week or so to spread the word about the importance of learning more about ovarian cancer. I am contacting Facebook and will continue to do so regarding our important petition.  Now it's time to share something unique, something joyful.

Today is a day to tend to what brings us the little "happys" in life.  A day for giving thanks to God (in your own way) and to those around us to make the curves or our mouths go "up".  A time to be in awe of nature, of something artful and inspiring.  A day to stand near a creek or river and listen to the trickling sounds that soothe your heart.  A time to play with the children and laugh from deep inside your gut.  A moment to take time to call a long lost friend or your parents and see how they are doing.  Say hello to your neighbor and smile brightly.   Someone's grandparent probably has an incredible story that needs to be told, and you can be there to listen.

At the risk of creating an outcry, I want to share the cutest little video of my sweet kitty cat Marilyn.  She is my little angel.  She keeps me from feeling lonely and gives me someone to talk to.  She has the most adorable little kitty voice, not a classic "meow", but ....well....I can't describe it.

She literally hangs out with me all the time.  She is so tidy and girly.  She is just the sweetest gift from God.  I was looking for a cat back in January, really debating the whole idea.  What am I doing?  What if something happens to me, who will take care of her?  Do I really want that litter box?  Ha!

I saw her needing adoption from a foster family at that time, along with other beautiful cats, but didn't take action because I just wasn't ready.  Every day I kept saying to myself that I wanted a cat.  I couldn't stop thinking about it.  Finally a few months later I couldn't take it any more.  The apartment was empty, just me and furniture, etc.  No life!

So I was searching and I saw her again!  I scheduled a meeting with the foster parents and just fell in love with her.  She was meant for me.

Before you watch, I want to let you know I did research on roses and cats.  I found no actual proof that rose petals cause problems.  My Marilyn loves rose petals.  So here she is.  Enjoy.



Love,
Denise


Monday, September 03, 2012

Taken Off The Field, my surgical report


Here is a copy of my surgical report.  I was blessed to have such an excellent surgeon in California. I am not sure how that all worked out because every step of the way up until I met him was one error after another.  

I had a hematology oncologist who was smart enough to override my gynecologists referral to a regular OBGYN surgeon.  Had he NOT done THAT, I would not be here. I am so thankful for both of those great doctors, for I did not know how significant that referral was until later.

After you read this you will understand why I was so angry for so long.  You will also understand my wardrobe.  I still cannot wear anything fitted, like jeans or regular pants.  I do need a makeover though.  I will save that for later. 

I am no longer angry.  

Love,
Denise

ALWAYS get a referral for a gynecological oncology surgeon if you are suspected to have ovarian cancer.  My surgery took over 4 hours hours.

(Editors note: I used PDF converter to apply this to my blog)
INDICATIONS / FINDINGS:
On opening the abdomen, the patient was found to have bilateral malignant ovarian masses with the right ovary that was stuck in the pelvic cul-de-sac. These were removed and frozen section pathology revealed malignancy. She had extra-ovarian disease with tumor masses primarily involving the pelvic peritoneum with smaller masses involving the peritoneum over the small bowel mesentery and the pericolic gutter as well as the right hemidiaphragms although minimally.  The patient had a tumor mass adjacent to the rectosigmoid colon which was excised. She had tumor involving the appendix and she had significant periaortic lymphadenopathy. She had no evidence of a bowel obstruction. At the end of the procedure the patient was optimally debulked with no tumor masses greater than a few millimeters in size. Therefore, an intraperitoneal Port-A-Cath was placed for subsequent intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:  The patient was brought into the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table.  She had a general anesthetic induced. She was placed in lithotomy position on the operating rating room table using Allen stirrups. SCDs were placed on the legs to prevent DVT. She received preoperative antibiotics and heparin. She was prepped and draped in normal fashion for an abdominal procedure. A surgical pause was performed. The patient's identity and surgical procedure were confirmed by all the surgical personnel.

After the patient was prepped and draped, we proceeded with a laparotomy incision. This was started at the pubis, taken to the right of the umbilicus and carried cephalad. This was taken through all layers into the peritoneal cavity.  On opening the abdomen, the patient was found to have turbid ascites of approximately 500 to 1000 mL.  This was aspirated.  A general exploration then ensued with the above noted findings.  A BookWalter retractor was used for retraction. The small and large bowel were packed into the upper abdomen and held in place with retractors.  We proceeded first with a BSO. The uterus was placed on traction. The round ligaments were transected with cautery and the retroperitoneum was opened. The infundibulopelvic ligaments were then isolated separate of the ureters, divided between clamps and ligated. The utero-ovarian ligaments were then divided between clamps. The right tube and ovary were then mobilized by incising the broad ligament.   It was then delivered out of the pelvis and sent for frozen section pathology.  On the other side a similar procedure was performed. The left tube and ovary were similarly sent fresh.

We then proceeded to complete the hysterectomy. The patient had tumor masses over the bladder peritoneum.  The incisions were made to include the tumor masses on the bladder peritoneum adjacent to the uterus.  The bladder was sharply and bluntly dissected off of the lower uterine segment and upper vagina. The uterine vessels were skeletonized. They were then cross-clamped, divided and suture transfixed. Similarly the cardinal ligaments and uterosacral ligaments were cross-clamped, divided and suture transfixed.

The upper vagina was cross-clamped. The uterus and cervix were then excised from the upper vagina and taken off the field. The vaginal angles were sutured, transfixed and the remaining vagina was closed with interrupted figure-of-eight sutures. Hemeostasis was secure.

The patient had multiple tumor masses involving the pelvic peritoneum. We systematically either excised these or fulgurated them. Tumor masses over the bladder peritoneum were excised by excising the peritoneal implants.  The patient had a. tumor plaque involving the left pelvic sidewall. The left  ureter was mobilized off the medial leaf of the broad ligament extensively. We then made a peritoneal incision to excise the entire left pelvic sidewall tumor plaque. The patient had tumor in the back of the vagina which was excised. She had a large tumor plaque in the right pericolic region and this was removed by making a peritoneal incision and excising the tumor intact. The remaining tumor masses were fulgurated or excised. The patient was noted to have a tumor mass adjacent to the rectosigmoid colon on the mesenteric side. This was similarly excised intact. Homeostasis was obtained with figure-of-eight sutures and cautery.

We then carefully inspected the small bowel. The patient was noted to have tumor on the appendix and therefore an appendectomy was performed. The appendiceal mesentery was  coapted with the Ligasure device and then divided. The base of the appendix was crushed, doubly ligated and then the appendix was excised from the stump and taken off the field. The base was fulgurated. Hemeostasis  was  secure. We continued to look for tumor implants over the small bowel mesentery and as these were encountered, they were systematically fulgurated. Similarly the patient had tumor implants over the right pericolic gutter which were fulgurated including a tumor mass adjacent to the posterior inferior aspect of the right lobe of the  liver next to the superior pole of the right kidney.  This was fulgurated. The patient had miliary implants over the hemidiaphragm and  there was no need to remove these since they were so small.

An omentectomy was performed. The omentum was mobilized off the transverse colon and then the lesser sac was widely developed. The gastroepiploic vessels were then serially sealed and divided using the Ligasure device. The omentum was taken off the field.

The remaining tumor involved the right and left periaortic lymph nodes. The peritoneum overlying the right common iliac artery was incised and the incision was taken cephalad to the third part of the duodenum which was mobilized and retracted cephalad. There was extensive malignant lymphadenopathy in the right precaval area and these tumor masses including the right common iliac region all the way up to the left renal vein going over the aorta. The right ovarian artery was encountered, clipped and divided as part of the resection of the malignant lymphadenopathy. The patient also had lymphadenopathy in the left periaortic region. These were excised off of the aorta. The patient also had malignant lymph nodes just in the left periaortic region just below the left renal vein. We similarly dissected these areas and sent them for permanent pathology. During the process we encountered the left ovarian artery which was similarly clipped and divided as part of the resection of the malignant nodes. The abdomen and pelvis were copiously irrigated. The patient had scant bleeding around the left renal vein and this was controlled with placement of Fibrillar Surgicel.

Because the patient was optimally debulked, we decided to place an intraperitoneal Port-A-Cath. The patient had the skin overlying the right subcostal region infiltrated with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. An  oblique incision was made in the skin. The dermis and subcutaneous tissue were divided. A subcutaneous pocket was developed over the fascia overlying the ribs. Using a tunneler, the intraperitoneal catheter was brought from the subcutaneous pocket into the abdomen. It was attached to the hub. Stay sutures of 2-0 Vicryl were then placed to secure the hub to the underlying fascia. The catheter was flushed with heparinized saline. The subcutaneous fascia was closed with a running 2-0 Vicryl and the skin was closed w1th running 4-0Monocryl. The catheter in the abdomen was cut to about 8 cm in length.

Again, the abdomen and pelvis were copiously irrigated and hemeostasis was secure. All instruments and lap tapes were then removed from the abdomen. The abdominal wall was then closed in the routine fashion using a mass closure technique of #l PDS from the superior and inferior aspects and median mid portion. Subcutaneous tissue was irrigated, hemeostasis secured and skin closed with staples. A pressure dressing was placed.Sponge, needle and instrument count were correct times 2. Estimated blood loss was  approximately 300    to 400 mL. The patient received no blood intraoperatively. She was allowed to wake up in the operating room and taken to the recovery room in good  condition.


Preliminary Report - if not signed by author

Sunday, September 02, 2012

Ovarian Cancer Feels Like This


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prometheus depicted in a sculpture by Nicolas-Sébastien Adam, 1762 (Louvre)
Prometheus (GreekΠρομηθεύς) is a Titanculture hero, and trickster figure who in Greek mythology is credited with thecreation of man from clay and the theft of fire for human use, an act that enabled progress and civilization. He is known for his intelligence, and as a champion of mankind.[1]
The punishment of Prometheus as a consequence of the theft is a major theme of his mythology, and is a popular subject of both ancient and modern art. Zeus, king of the Olympian gods, sentenced the Titan to eternal torment for his transgression. The immortal Prometheus was bound to a rock, where each day an eagle, the emblem of Zeus, was sent to feed on his liver, only to have it grow back to be eaten again the next day. In some stories, Prometheus is freed at last by the hero Heracles (Hercules).

I post this image because this is what it feels like to have Ovarian Cancer. 
The irony is that Ovarian Cancer is also a trickster.  Our ovaries are necessary for life, without them, mankind would not be able to duplicate. We cannot feel our little gems.  They are protected.   As ovarian cancer grows, everything around the ovary is displaced, and that displacement is what causes our symptoms. Tricky little (expletive), isn't it!
Ask any woman who has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and she will probably tell you that she had strange abdominal pain.  She may say that she had a poor appetite.  She may say that her doctor gave her antacids and to keep an eye on it, maybe it is IBS.  And then out of nowhere she has to go to the ER because the pain is so bad, she feels like she is going to die, and they do a CT scan.  The doctor says she needs surgery and results show ovarian cancer.  
Our surgery is radical, the chemo ravages through our bodies to kill the cancer, leaving behind permanent damage.  Often our abdomen becomes a permanent stomping ground for never ending pain and suffering.
Maybe find the time to go to http://www.whyteal.org/ and learn about it.  This month is Ovarian Cancer Awareness month and our color is Teal.  
I hope every woman learns more about it just so that they have a better say so in how their doctor listens to her concerns if sadly she has unexplained problems, and her inner voice says that something is wrong.
I love you all,
Denise

Saturday, September 01, 2012

Presidential Proclamation -- National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, 2012


Presidential Proclamation -- National Ovarian Cancer   Awareness Month, 2012


NATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS MONTH, 2012
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION
This year, thousands of American women will lose their lives to ovarian cancer.  They are mothers and daughters, sisters and grandmothers, community members and cherished friends -- and the absence they leave in our hearts will be deeply felt forever.  During National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, we honor those we have lost, show our support for women who bravely carry on the fight, and take action to lessen the tragic toll ovarian cancer takes on families across our Nation.
Sadly, women are all too often diagnosed with this disease when it has already reached an advanced stage.  Because early detection is the best defense against ovarian cancer, it is essential that women know the risk factors associated with the disease.  Women who are middle-aged or older, who have a family history of ovarian or breast cancer, or who have had certain cancers in the past are at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.  Any woman who thinks she is at risk of ovarian cancer    or who experiences symptoms, including abdominal pain, pressure, or swelling -- should talk with her health care provider.  To learn more, visit www.Cancer.gov.
Ongoing progress in science and medicine is moving us forward in the battle against ovarian cancer, and my Administration remains committed to improving outcomes for women suffering from this devastating illness.  Through agencies across the Federal Government, we are continuing to invest in research that paves the way for a new generation of tests and treatments.  Through the Centers for Disease Control's Inside Knowledgecampaign, we are working to raise awareness about the signs and symptoms of ovarian cancer.  The Affordable Care Act already bans insurance companies from dropping a woman's coverage because she has ovarian cancer, and from placing lifetime or restrictive annual dollar limits on her coverage.  Beginning in 2014, the law will also prohibit insurers from denying coverage or charging higher premiums because a woman has ovarian cancer -- or any other pre-existing condition.
Ovarian cancer affects the lives of far too many women every year, and the tragedy it leaves in its wake reverberates in communities across our country.  This month, we stand with all those who have known the pain of ovarian cancer, and we rededicate ourselves to the pursuit of new and better ways to prevent, detect, and treat this devastating disease.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2012 as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month.  I call upon citizens, government agencies, organizations, health care providers, and research institutions to raise ovarian cancer awareness and continue helping Americans live longer, healthier lives.  I also urge women across our country to talk to their health care providers and learn more about this disease.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.
BARACK OBAMA

Thank you kind readers for receiving this important information: